Mowing Machine Ease of Use
A critique on the heaviness and use of manual labour for the lawnmower by "A.P.", writing in The Cottage Gardener and Country Gentleman's Companion.
MOWING MACHINES.
"Will you oblige me by giving your opinion on Lawn Mowing Machines? What size do you prefer? Can one man actually use a 16-inch one? Are they apt to go wrong? and could an ordinary unskilled labourer use them?
"I keep one gardener always, but have more work than he can do. I assist him with ordinary labourers, and having about an acre of lawn, it would be a relief if I could cut it by these labourers, instead of employing his more valuable time. I suppose a horse would mark the lawn with his feet. Whose machines do you consider best?-A. P."
[It is very wrong to say that a mowing machine has ever been made that can be worked by one man. There is not a man on earth who will work a mowing machine to earn his salt, over and above the work of a third-rate scytheman. It is hard work to pull the easiest mowing machine, and it requires one man to guide it. Budding's Engine is the best for small lawns, and a handy labourer ought to guide it better than the best gardener in London; but it requires some practice, and first to be shown how to "bite" by some neighbour; also how to lower and rise the cutters, and how to oil the engine-there is no more art in pulling it than there is in dragging a harrow. Besides the superiority of the "cut" by the engine, the work may be done in hot, dry days, or in the afternoon, when no scythe could work. Where there is a stock of plants and a nice flower garden to occupy a moderate gardener's time, it is very extravagant to waste his time in mowing with a machine or scythe. Where "help is allowed" it should be for the mowing and other heavy labour; for mowing with the best machine is hard work, except when the lawn and the grass are as even and fine as a Turkey carpet.]
PublicationOtherDateSourceGoogle Books/Cottage Gardener/1855/P134Link